Revoke

Is it the best option to wait four years to change a government? When things go really wrong the people must have alternatives. There are some options but are too difficult for the common people to change the government that is practically out of their hands.

There must be options to revoke the power given to representatives. And in general people must have more power. When lawmakers want to change constitution they can do without people support, I am thinking that for this type of main changes there must be include that a majority of the people must support by law—not only lawmakers and judges act as safeguards.

Also we have a problem when politicians stay too long, they —as Oscar Wild said, I think — need to be changed as often as diapers. I am thinking not those in charge only, those who are leading parties too. And the way to do it is part of solving other problem. When people have to choose between really don't want this and hell no this, people can have the option to send all of them out of participation. This force to refresh the parties—because the primaries are a joke. People must have the power to say I don't like any of the options—this could be done when nulls win. If null votes exceed fifty percent, the election is void and new candidates must be put forward — the same ones cannot stand again.